Mr. Stuart defended StreamCast Networks, the company behind the Morpheus peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing software, in an important case decided by the Supreme Court of the United States on June 23, 2005.
Twenty-eight of the world's largest entertainment companies brought the lawsuit against the makers of the Morpheus, Grokster, and KaZaA software products, aiming to set a precedent to use against other technology companies (P2P and otherwise). As we noted in our arguments before the Court, the case raises a fundamental question at the border between copyright and innovation: When should the distributor of a multi-purpose tool be held liable for the infringements that may be committed by end-users of the tool?
The Supreme Court's landmark decision in Sony Corporation of America v. Universal City Studios, Inc. (a.k.a. the "Sony Betamax ruling") found that a distributor cannot be held liable for users' infringement so long as the tool is capable of substantial noninfringing uses. This standard has served innovators, copyright industries, and the public for more than 20 years. Relying on this precedent, the Ninth Circuit ruled that the distributors of Grokster and Morpheus P2P file-sharing software cannot be held liable for users' copyright violations.
The Supreme Court set aside the Ninth Circuit ruling, but it refused to overturn the Betamax doctrine or to force technology companies to redesign multipurpose technologies. Hollywood's main objective thus went unfulfilled.
But rather than clarify the rules for technology innovators, the Supreme Court instead punted on the hard questions by crafting a new doctrine of copyright infringement liability called "inducement." In the wake of the ruling, innovators now have three uncertain copyright doctrines to worry about: inducement, contributory and vicarious (for more on these doctrines, see EFF's white paper, "What P2P Developers Need to Know About Copyright"). This uncertainty will chill innovators, deter investors, and act as a brake on economic growth.
Supreme Court Decision
- PDF of the Supreme Court decision June 27, 2005
- Key Quotes from the Supreme Court Decision
- Press Release: Supreme Court Ruling Will Chill Technology Innovation
- Audio from the post-decision press conference: 3MB MP3
Supreme Court Oral Argument Transcript
- Transcript of Oral Argument [PDF, offsite]
Supreme Court Documents
- Summary of all briefs filed before the Supreme Court [PDF, 460K] (prepared by Jonathan Band of Morrison&Foerster LLP)
Reply Briefs of Petitioners
March 18, 2005- Reply Brief for Motion Picture Studio and Recording Company Petitioners [PDF, 184K]
- Reply Brief for the Music Publisher Petitioners [PDF, 204K]
Briefs of Respondents (StreamCast, Grokster)
March 1, 2005- Brief of Respondents [PDF, 524K]
Amicus Briefs Supporting Respondents
March 1, 2005- Brief of Computer Science Professors [PDF, 136K]
- Brief of National Association of Shareholder and Consumer Attorneys (NASCAT) [PDF, 72K]
- Brief of National Venture Capital Association [PDF, 220K]
- Brief of Creative Commons [PDF, 396K]
- Brief of Malla Pollack and Other Law Profesbsors [PDF, 200K]
- Brief of Professors Edward Lee, Peter Shane, and Peter Swire [PDF, 120K]
- Brief of Felix Oberholzer-Gee and Koleman Strumpf [PDF, 600K]
- Brief of Intel Corporation [PDF, 96K]
- Brief of Internet Law Professors W. Fisher III, J. Zittrain and J. Palfrey, Jr. [PDF, 336K]
- Brief of the Consumer Electronics Association, the Computer and Communications Industry Association, and the Home Recording Rights Coalition [PDF, 388K]
- Brief of the Cellular Telecommunications&Internet Association, US Telecom Association, US Internet Industry Association, AT&T, BellSouth, MCI, SAVVIS, SBC, Sun Microsystems, and Verizon [PDF, 388K]
- Brief of Professor Glynn Lunney and Other Law Professors [PDF, 196K]
- Brief of Innovation Scholars and Economists [PDF, 339K]
- Brief of 60 Technology Law Professors and USACM [PDF, 271K]
- Brief of the Consumer Federation of America, Consumers Union, Free Press, and Public Knowledge [PDF, 182K]
- Brief of the Free Software Foundation and Nbew Yorkers for Fair Use [PDF, 121K]
- Brief of Musical Artists [PDF, 179K]
- Brief of Media Studies Professors [PDF, 167K]
- Brief of Charles Nesson [PDF, 140K]
- Brief of Altnet, Inc [PDF, 404K]
- Brief Sharman Networks Limited [PDF, 116K]
- Brief of Distributed Computing Industry [PDF, 120K]
- Brief of the American Conservative Union and National Taxpayers Union [PDF, 380K]
- Brief of American Civil Liberties Union, National Library Associations, Internet Archive and Project Gutenberg [PDF, 1.3M]
- Brief of Emerging Technology Companies [PDF, 288K]
- Brief of Eagle Forum and Educational Defense Fund [PDF, 276K]
Briefs of Petitioners (entertainment companies)
January 24, 2005- Brief for Motion Picture Studio and Recording Company Petitioners [PDF 352K]
- Brief for Songwriter and Music Publisher Petitioners [PDF 932K]
Amicus Briefs Supporting Petitioners
January 24, 2005- Brief of the Progress and Freedom Foundation [PDF 172K]
- Brief of the United States Solicitor General's Office [PDF 112K]
- Brief of the Business Software Alliance [PDF 156K]
- Brief of Law Professors, Economics Professors and Treatise Authors in Support of Petitioners [PDF 188K]
- Brief of Kids First Coalition, Christian Coalition of America, Concerned Women for America, et al in Support of Petitioners [PDF 328K]
- Brief of Law and Economics Professors in Support of Petitioners [PDF 56K]
- Brief of the Defenders of Property Rights in Support of Petitioners [PDF 60K]
- Brief of State Attorneys General in Support of Petitioners [PDF 256K]
- Brief of Commissioner of Baseball, NBA, NFL, Professional Photographers of America, et al in Support of Petitioners [PDF 92K]
- Brief filed by Napster, Movielink, CinemaNow, MusicNet et al.
- Brief of the American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, Directors Guild of America, Screen Actors Guild, and Writers Guild of America, West [PDF 840K]
- Brief of International Rights Owners [PDF 252K]
- Brief of National Association of Recording Merchandisers [PDF 80K]
- Brief of Macrovision Corporation [PDF 1.4MB]
- Brief of Professors Menell, Nimmer, Merges, and Hughes in Support of Petitioners [PDF 104K]
- Brief of National Academy of Recording Arts&Sciences (NARAS), et al, in Support of Petitioners [PDF 28K]
- Brief of ASCAP, BMI, et al in Support of Petitioners [PDF 60K]
- Brief of Americans for Tax Reform in Support of Petitioners [PDF 184K]
- Brief of the National Assoc. of Broadcasters (NAB) in Support of Petitioners [PDF 1.4M]
Amicus Briefs Neutral as to Result
January 24, 2005- Brief of The Digital Media Association, Netcoalition, The Center for Democracy and Technology, and the Information Technology Association of America [PDF 196K]
- Brief of Senators Leahy and Hatch in Support of Neither Party [PDF 112K]
- Brief of the American Intellectual Property Law Association (AIPLA) in Support of Vacatur and Remand [PDF 92K]
- Brief of Video Software Dealers Association (VSDA) Suggesting Reversal [PDF 308K]
- Brief of Professor Lee A. Hollaar in Support of Neither Party [PDF 204K]
- Brief of Audible Magic, Digimarc and Gracenote in Support of Neither Party [PDF 72K]
- Brief of IEEE-USA in Support of Neither Party [PDF 340K]
- Brief of iMesh in Support of Neither Party [PDF 28K]
- Brief of Snocap in Support of Neither Party [PDF 28K]
- Brief of Intellectual Property Owners Association in Support of Neither Party [PDF 2.6M]
Petition for Certiorari
- EFF's Brief in Opposition [PDF 343k] of Petition for certiorari. November 8, 2004
- Computer and Communications Industry Association and Internet Archive's Brief in Opposition [PDF 220k] of Petition for certiorari. November 8, 2004
- American Intellectual Property Law Association's Brief [PDF 1.6M] in Support of Neither Party. November 8, 2004
- Roxio, et al's Brief in Support [PDF 1.7M] of certiorari. (Brief includes Roxio, Inc., Musicnet, Inc., Code 7 Entertainment, Inc., Cinemanow, Inc., Sea Blue Media, LLC (d/b/a Cdigix), and Movielink, LLC. Historical note: Roxio is the current owner of the Napster service and brand.) November 8, 2004
- Progress&Freedom Foundation's Brief in Support [PDF 137k] of certiorari. November 8, 2004
- Washington Law Foundation's Brief in Support [PDF 1.1M] of certiorari. November 8, 2004
- Law Professors' Brief in Support [PDF 219k] of certiorari. November 8, 2004
- States' Brief in Support [PDF 995k] of certiorari. (Brief includes AL, AK, AR, AZ, CO, DE, FL, GA, HI, ID, IL, IN, KS, KY, LA, MA, MI, MO, MS, MT, NE, NC, NV, NJ, NM, ND, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, UT, VA, VT, WV, WI, Guam.) November 8, 2004
- Omnibus Brief in Support [PDF 230k] of certiorari. (Brief includes Office of the Commissioner Of Baseball, National Basketball Association, American Society Of Media Photographers, Professional Photographers Of America, Directors Guild Of America, Writers Guild Of America (West), Screen Actors Guild, Association Of American Publishers, Association Of American University Presses, Producers Guild Of America, Graphic Artists Guild, Entertainment Software Association, Video Software Dealers Association, Interactive Entertainment Merchants Association And Author's Guild Of America.) November 8, 2004
- NARAS et al's Brief in Support [PDF 787k] of certiorari. (Brief includes National Academy of Recording Arts & Sciences, American Federation of Television and Radio Artists, American Federation of Musicians of the United States and Canada, The Country Music Association, Inc., The Gospel Music Association, the Hip-Hop Summit Action Network, Jazz Alliance International, Inc., and the Rhythm & Blues Foundation.) November 8, 2004
- International Rights Owners Brief in Support [PDF 182k] of certiorari. November 8, 2004
- Artists' coalition Brief in Support [PDF 309k] of certiorari. (Coalition includes The Eagles, Brooks & Dunn, The Dixie Chicks, Bonnie Raitt, Sheryl Crow, Babyface, The Grateful Dead, Jimmy Buffet, Patti Loveless, Stevie Nicks, Gavin Rossdale.) November 8, 2004
- SESAC's Brief in Support [PDF 209k] of certiorari. November 8, 2004
- ASCAP et al's Brief in Support [PDF 458k] of certiorari (Brief includes ASCAP, BMI, Broadcast Music, Inc., Association of Independent Music Publishers, Church Music Publishers Association, Nashville Songwriters Association International, Songwriters Guild of America.) November 8, 2004
- MGM et al's Petition for certiorari [PDF 1.07M]. October 8, 2004
Ninth Circuit Appeal Documents
- Ninth Circuit ruling affirming the district court grant of partial summary judgment [PDF, 131k]
Ninth Circuit Opinion affirming district court: "This appeal presents the question of whether distributors of peer-to-peer file-sharing computer networking software may be held contributorily or vicariously liable for copyright infringements by users. Under the circumstances presented by this case, we conclude that the defendants are not liable for contributory and vicarious copyright infringement and affirm the district court's partial grant of summary judgment." (Aug. 19, 2004).
You can also get a PDF of the decision via your favorite P2P network:
» magnet:// link: 20040819_mgm_v_grokster_decision.pdf
» ed2k:// link: 20040819_mgm_v_grokster_decision.pdf
Oral Argument
- Oral Arguments before the 9th Circuit
Audio: [WMA 10.4MB | MP3 16.4MB | OGG 16.5MB]
Transcript available here, courtesy of Groklaw (February 3, 2004)
Briefs
- Movie Studio and Recording Industry Plaintiffs' opening brief [PDF 1.8M]
- Music Publisher Plaintiffs' opening brief [PDF 6.6M]
- StreamCast opposition brief [PDF 140k] Sept. 17, 2003
- Grokster opposition brief [PDF 2.8M] Sept. 17, 2003
- Music Publisher Plaintiffs' reply brief [PDF 884k]
- Movie Studio and Recording Industry Plaintiffs' Reply Brief [PDF 2.9M] (redacted public version)
Amicus Briefs supporting Plaintiffs
- Amicus brief of law professors and treatise authors [PDF 3.8MB]
- Amicus brief of online music services (Roxio, BuyMusic, etc.) Also available as a PDF [1.1M]
- Amicus brief of entertainment industry groups [PDF 234k] (Amer. Film Marketing Assn, AFM, AFTRA, ASCAP, etc.)
- Amicus brief of international rights owners [PDF 4M]
Amicus Briefs supporting Defendants
- Amicus brief of ACLU/Internet Archive/Project Gutenberg/library associations
- Amicus brief of 40 law professors [PDF 212k]
- Amicus brief of Altnet [PDF 788k]
- Amicus brief of Consumer Electronics Association (CEA) [PDF 1.1M]
- Amicus brief of CCIA/NetCoalition. Also available as a PDF [52k]
- Amicus brief of Sharman Networks Ltd. [PDF 920k]
- Order Granting Expedited Appeal [PDF 2.0M]
District Court Documents
- Order Entering Judgment and Certifying for Immediate Appeal [PDF 489k] June 18, 2003
Cross Motions for Summary Judgment
- Opinion Granting Def. Motions for Partial Summary Judgment [PDF 87k]
- Transcript of Oral Argument [PDF 2.0M]
Briefs
- Plaintiffs' Opening Brief [PDF 3.7M]
- StreamCast Opening Brief [PDF 231k] on Contributory Infringement
- StreamCast Opening Brief [PDF 215k] on Vicarious Infringement
- Grokster Opening Brief [PDF 1.6M]
- Plaintiffs Opposition Brief [PDF 2.6M]
- StreamCast Opposition Brief [PDF 118k]
- Grokster Opposition Brief [PDF 345k]
- Plaintiff's Reply Brief [PDF 1.7M]
- StreamCast Reply Brief [PDF 186k]
- Grokster Reply Brief [PDF 1.2M]
Amicus Briefs
- Amicus Brief of Lime Wire, Inc., Free Peers, Inc. and Raphael Manfredi [PDF 134k]
- Consumer Electronic Assn. Brief [PDF 34k]
Defendants Initial Motion for Summary Judgment
Briefs
- Streamcast Opening Brief [PDF 239k]
- Declarations in Support
- Barlow, also available as a PDF [739k]
- Nessary, also available as a PDF [542k]
- Smith, also available as a PDF [1.7M]
- Shirky, also available as a PDF [1.9M]
- Newby [PDF 1.3M]
- Mayers, also available as a PDF [761k]
- Prelinger, also available as a PDF [1.1M]
- Kahle, also available as a PDF [1.2M]
- Griffin, also available as a PDF [504k]
- Janis Ian [PDF 2.2M]
- Grokster Opening Brief [PDF 1.6M]
- MGM Plaintiffs' Opposition Brief [PDF 1.4M]
- Leiber Plaintiffs Opposition Brief [PDF 1.5M]
- StreamCast Reply Brief, Numbers One [PDF 130k] and Two [PDF 130k]
- Grokster Reply Brief [PDF 613k]
- Kazaa BV Reply Brief [PDF 278k]
- MGM Reply Brief [PDF 212K]
Documents relating to Sharman Networks (Kazaa)
- Sharman Networks' Application for Protective Order [PDF 2.7M]
- Application for protective order [PDF 14M] in U.S. litigation, including copy of Australian "Anton Piller" Search and Seizure order February 6, 2004
- Declaration of Dorman [PDF 2.4M]
Sharman Counter-Claims (Antitrust and Copyright Misuse)
- Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss [PDF 70k]
- Plaintiffs' Motion to Dismiss Sharman Counter-Claims [PDF 3.0M]
Jurisdiction
Complaints and Answers
- Sharman's Third Amended Answer [PDF 9.9M] and Counter-Claims (including for antitrust, copyright infringement and breach of Kazaa terms of use)
- First Amended Complaint: MGM v. Grokster [PDF 1.3M]; Leiber v. Consumer Empowerment [PDF 1.8M]
- Kazaa BV Answer [PDF 157k]
- StreamCast (then MusicCity) Answer, also available as a PDF [27k]
- MGM v. Grokster Complaint [PDF 143k]
